By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Stage On Bay liquor license quashed; Marshall Tucker Band show moved to Lucas
Mayor and Council acknowledge lawsuit nearly inevitable
The Stage On Bay owner Charlie Schmitt stands with attorney Will Claiborne as West Savannah resident Charles Brown speaks in support of the project at today's City Council meeting.

IN A remarkable development at this afternoon’s regular meeting, City Council voted 8-1 to deny an alcoholic beverage license to the new West Savannah music venue The Stage On Bay, slated to hold its first concert tomorrow night, Feb. 3.

This evening The Stage On Bay announced the Friday night show has been moved to the Lucas Theatre for the Arts downtown, which will honor all previously purchased tickets.

Only Alderman Julian Miller voted to support The Stage On Bay liquor license, on the basis that the City has no legal standing to deny it – an opinion confirmed even by several other Council members who voted against the venue.

The hearing had been held over from two weeks prior to give owner/operator Charlie Schmitt time to meet with the Hudson Hill Neighborhood Association, many members of which are firmly opposed to the venue, citing parking problems and disruption caused by concertgoers.

While more neighborhood interaction took place in the meantime, it wasn’t enough to assuage the concerns of residents, who eventually swayed Mayor and Council to their side even though a possibly successful lawsuit against the City is nearly inevitable based largely on the fact that zoning currently permits such a usage.

Representing Stage On Bay, attorney Will Claiborne told Council that “There are no current alcohol licenses in the neighborhood comparable to this venue. All the others that people are talking about are convenience stores and one package store.”

Claiborne said the zoning already approves such a usage in the location, and “The City has zero objective data” to indicate there is any reason to interfere with the venue’s right to obtain such a license.

Claiborne went on to say that while “nobody wakes up in the morning wanting to be a plaintiff in a lawsuit,” if City Council denied the liquor license “there could then be a due process or takings violation resulting in court action.”

Most of City Council recognized on the record the legal dangers of denying the Stage On Bay liquor license – though it did come out in the meeting that the venue hadn’t even been granted a Certificate of Occupancy, meaning the Marshall Tucker Band concert could still have been in jeopardy in any case.

Alderman Tony Thomas said, “I feel for the residents of this area,” but “we are caught up in a very problematic issue. If we don’t allow this, the venue will file a case that the City took their right, and ability, and their investment from them. And either the City wins or the City loses.”

Schmitt and Claiborne have both said there has already been over half a million dollars invested into Stage On Bay to improve the former light industrial space.

Thomas said if a lawsuit happens, the City will essentially “be going to court against our own laws.”

Mayor Eddie DeLoach and AldermanThomas both stated concerns over the continuing lack of protocol involving alcoholic beverage licensing.

“The reason we’re in this situation today is because nothing has been done in the past,” said DeLoach.

Alderman Julian Miller, the only one to eventually vote to grant the license, said, “This Council has no legal standing to deny this.”

He went on to muse, “Alcohol matters really shouldn't come before this body at all,” suggesting that an administrative officer position could be created to streamline the process.

Alderman Van Johnson, in whose district The Stage On Bay is located and who has spearheaded the effort to deny the license, said “This isn’t a matter of law. It’s a matter of courage.”

Johnson went on to taunt that if The Stage On Bay sues the City, “we have lawyers too.”

Johnson reiterated his previously stated position that The Stage On Bay owner should have tried to open the venue in the Historic District.

“This venue is a win/win somewhere else, but a lose/lose in this location,” said Johnson, widely considered to be mulling a mayoral run in the next City election.

Miller, in a veiled jab at Johnson said, “We’re a nation of laws,” and that “courage can be defined in different ways. Courage also means supporting the law when it’s not politically expedient to do so.”

However, as several neighborhood leaders took to the podium to address Council stating their opposition to the venue’s liquor license, most City Council members did an about-face from what they’d just said.

Just before the vote was taken, Thomas said he would vote against the venue even though he knew the City would be taken to court. He also urged Schmitt to consider moving The Stage On Bay to a different location. He did so without mentioning all the investment that had already been made.

Alderman At Large Brian Foster, who had also previously said there was little standing to deny the license, stated before the vote that nonetheless he would also "support Van" and vote to deny it.